翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Golina, Stargard County ・ Golina-Kolonia ・ Golinan ・ Golinci ・ Golinda, Texas ・ Golindouch ・ Golinga ・ Golingka ・ Golinhac ・ Golini ・ Golini Tomb ・ Golinjevo ・ Golinka, Greater Poland Voivodeship ・ Golinka, West Pomeranian Voivodeship ・ Golinski ・ Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management ・ Golis Mountains ・ Golis Telecom Somalia ・ Golisano Children's Museum of Naples ・ Goliszew, Greater Poland Voivodeship ・ Goliszew, Łódź Voivodeship ・ Goliszowiec ・ Goliszów ・ GoLite ・ Golitsyn ・ Golitsyn (crater) ・ Golitsyno ・ Golitsyno, Moscow Oblast ・ Goliyan, Hamadan ・ Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management ： ウィキペディア英語版 Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management ''Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management'', 824 F. Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Cal.), was a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiff, Karen Golinski, challenged the constitutionality of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined, for the purposes of federal law, ''marriage'' as being between one man and one woman, and ''spouse'' as a husband or wife of the opposite sex. On February 22, 2012, the District Court held section 3 unconstitutional. The case was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Department of Justice (DOJ), on July 3, 2012, asked the Supreme Court to take the case before the Ninth Circuit decided it, so it could be heard with two other DOMA-related cases, ''Gill v. Office of Personnel Management'' and ''Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services''. The Ninth Circuit delayed oral argument pending action by the Supreme Court. Following that Court's decision in ''United States v. Windsor'' dismissed the appeal on July 23, 2013. ==Background== In 2008, when California first extended marriage to same-sex couples, Karen Golinski, an attorney and 19-year employee of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, married Amy Cunninghis.〔("Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management," Lambda Legal ), accessed 22 October 2013.〕 Golinski subsequently applied for family medical insurance coverage through her employer. When the application was denied, she filed a complaint under the Ninth Circuit's Employment Dispute Resolution Plan. Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, in his administrative capacity, ruled in 2009 that she was entitled to spousal health benefits, but the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced that it would not comply with the ruling. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.